Early Career Researchers' Publishing Boot Camp Mentors

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

This short survey asks about your recent mentoring session with an early-career researcher focused on a manuscript draft. Your responses will help us understand the mentoring process and how it supports manuscript development.

Name

First

Last

All scaled items are 1 = Strongly Disagree, 7 = Strongly Agree

Section 1: Continuity and Focus of the Follow-up Session

This follow-up session built effectively on the previous mentoring session.

Selected Value: 4

believe before make

The session maintained a clear focus on the mentee’s manuscript draft.

Selected Value: 4

The mentee came prepared with revisions or questions based on prior feedback.

Selected Value: 4

The session addressed the mentee’s current priorities for manuscript development.

Selected Value: 4

Section 2: Progress Since the Previous Session

The mentee made meaningful progress on the manuscript since the previous session.

Selected Value: 4

The mentee implemented key revisions discussed in the earlier mentoring session.

Selected Value: 4

The overall quality of the manuscript has improved since the last meeting.

Selected Value: 4

The manuscript’s argumentation and structure are stronger than before.

Selected Value: 4

Section 3: Mentoring Effectiveness (Follow-up)

I provided feedback that built on earlier guidance.

Selected Value: 4

My feedback helped to refine, rather than reorient, the manuscript.

Selected Value: 4

The session helped to prioritize final or near-final revisions.

Selected Value: 4

The mentoring discussion appeared to increase the mentee’s confidence in the manuscript.

Selected Value: 4

Section 4: Readiness for Submission

The manuscript is close to being ready for journal submission.

Selected Value: 4

The mentee is clear about the remaining revisions needed before submission.

Selected Value: 4

The mentee appears confident about submitting the manuscript to the target journal.

Selected Value: 4

This session moved the manuscript significantly closer to submission.

Selected Value: 4

Section 5: Additional Information

What progress did the mentee make on the manuscript since the previous mentoring session?

What aspects of the manuscript still need the most work before submission?

What support do you believe would be most helpful for the mentee at this stage?

Overall, how have the mentoring sessions contributed to the mentee’s development as a management scholar and academic writer?

How long was the session?